Comments on: Skywatch Radio November 28, 2007 http://newyorkskywatch.com/2007/11/27/skywatch-radio-november-28-2007/ We are an investigative group researching various phenomena related to weather control technology. Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:48:22 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Kidstardust http://newyorkskywatch.com/2007/11/27/skywatch-radio-november-28-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-39 Kidstardust Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:48:17 +0000 http://newyorkskywatch.com/2007/11/27/skywatch-radio-november-28-2007/#comment-39 thanks Wayne! Scott can see deep into these topics and his knowledge of Scalar technology and electromagnetics are helpful in grasping the science of this forced climate change. Good point on how the spraying could be stopped. It is a glimmer of hope. We also want to interview you soon. KSD thanks Wayne!
Scott can see deep into these topics and his knowledge of Scalar technology and electromagnetics are helpful in grasping the science of this forced climate change.
Good point on how the spraying could be stopped. It is a glimmer of hope.
We also want to interview you soon.
KSD

]]> By: Wayne Fries http://newyorkskywatch.com/2007/11/27/skywatch-radio-november-28-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Wayne Fries Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:02:08 +0000 http://newyorkskywatch.com/2007/11/27/skywatch-radio-november-28-2007/#comment-38 Just heard your interview with Scott Stevens, Nov 28. The level of the knowledge base and topics of the interview is incredible. A few months ago I was reading on some internet boards comments like "it was cloudy today, I took pictures of the planes spraying". At the time that seemed like a huge revelation to me. This interview goes many levels past that basic knowledge. I am confused by the statement that the spraying cannot be stopped by public involvement and pressure. If a faction within the military stopped the nuclear weapons from going to Iran, then there are weaknesses within the power structure. On an intellectual level, when faced with huge problems outside of our control, there seems to be only a few ways to live within the situation. 1. Gain more knowledge of the situation and fight against it at all costs. 2. Deny the problem and continue to live within our present materialistic society structure. 3. Act in a totally selfish manner because the end of society is near and there will be no consequences for past actions. 4. Develop a small counter culture group that will try to live outside of the mainstream and remain safe or untouched. I am intrigued by the repeated discussion of free energy devices by persons associated with the weather modification phenomenon. The ideas put forward by Tesla are often discussed. At a certain level the inventions are useful to our present energy hungry society. At a higher level they are extremely powerful and dangerous. To produce and publicly promote them is probably suicidal. I have not yet decided which of the 4 choices above is right for me at this time. Is it better to fight, to deny, or to hide? To work for the good of society or the individual? Very high level moral questions. It seems that we will all be forced to decide in the near future. Just heard your interview with Scott Stevens, Nov 28. The level of the knowledge base and topics of the interview is incredible. A few months ago I was reading on some internet boards comments like “it was cloudy today, I took pictures of the planes spraying”. At the time that seemed like a huge revelation to me. This interview goes many levels past that basic knowledge.
I am confused by the statement that the spraying cannot be stopped by public involvement and pressure. If a faction within the military stopped the nuclear weapons from going to Iran, then there are weaknesses within the power structure.
On an intellectual level, when faced with huge problems outside of our control, there seems to be only a few ways to live within the situation.

1. Gain more knowledge of the situation and fight against it at all costs.
2. Deny the problem and continue to live within our present materialistic society structure.
3. Act in a totally selfish manner because the end of society is near and there will be no consequences for past actions.
4. Develop a small counter culture group that will try to live outside of the mainstream and remain safe or untouched.
I am intrigued by the repeated discussion of free energy devices by persons associated with the weather modification phenomenon. The ideas put forward by Tesla are often discussed. At a certain level the inventions are useful to our present energy hungry society. At a higher level they are extremely powerful and dangerous. To produce and publicly promote them is probably suicidal.
I have not yet decided which of the 4 choices above is right for me at this time. Is it better to fight, to deny, or to hide? To work for the good of society or the individual? Very high level moral questions. It seems that we will all be forced to decide in the near future.

]]>